Skip to content
by IQAC KIITKIIT Deemed to be University — Internal Quality Assurance Cell

Publication2025

Minority Rights in South Asia: A Comparative Analysis of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh with Special Reference to Blasphemy Laws

The record

Type
Publication
Date
1 January 2025
Level
International — held abroad
Journal
Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law and Practice
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
239-259
Published
1 January 2025
Scopus ID
105018493001
ISSN
26336626
Authors
3
Open access
No
Citations
0
International co-authorship
Yes
Co-author countries
BD, IN

Classification

Every label below carries the reasoning it was assigned on, the confidence band it was assigned in, and what produced it. The rubric is published.

UN Sustainable Development Goals

  1. 16.1 Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere

    TargetPrimaryHigh confidenceJudged

    Comparative legal analysis of blasphemy laws examines institutional accountability and rule of law protection for minorities.

    High confidence
    The subject matter is a strong and direct inference from the record type, the funding or organising body, or the programme context, even where the title alone is thin. Example: an ICMR-funded project against SDG 3, on the strength of the agency.
    Judged
    Judged against the published classification rubric, under the rubric and prompt versions recorded with the run that produced it.
    Produced by
    claude-haiku-4-5-20251001, under kortex-publication-v1

  2. 10.3 Ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of outcome, including by eliminating discriminatory laws and practices

    TargetSecondaryHigh confidenceJudged

    Document addresses discrimination against religious minorities and proposes legal reforms for equal protection.

    Produced by
    claude-haiku-4-5-20251001, under kortex-publication-v1

  3. 17.6 Enhance North-South, South-South and triangular cooperation on science, technology and innovation, and knowledge sharing

    TargetSecondaryHigh confidenceRule-derivedrule sdg17-structural-v1

    Structural signal: co-authorship outside India.

    Rule-derived
    Emitted by a deterministic rule from structural signals rather than judged from the record’s text. The rule carries a version, so rule-derived and judged labels stay separable.
    Produced by
    sdg17-structural-v1, under kortex-publication-v1

Viksit Bharat @2047

  1. vb-4.5 Legal reform, justice and citizen rights

    Sub-themePrimaryHigh confidenceJudged

    Legal reform recommendations strengthen justice systems and citizen rights protection for marginalized populations.

    Produced by
    claude-haiku-4-5-20251001, under kortex-publication-v1

Each label above carries the instrument and the version that produced it. How each classification is reached.

Evidence

Kortex hosts no documents. Evidence is an outbound link to the authority that holds it.

No outbound evidence link is recorded for this activity. The record below states which source it came from and when it was last read.

Provenance

Which source system this record came from, how many source rows were resolved into it, and when each was last read.

Source rows resolved into this record
1

Each record carries the date Kortex last read it from its source system. That is a freshness date and not a verification: Kortex records what its sources say and when it read them, and it does not check those statements against any external authority. No claim on this site is described as verified, because none is.

Citing this record

This URL is stable. A record’s permalink is frozen when it is published and is not regenerated if its title is later corrected.

KIIT Deemed to be University. “Minority Rights in South Asia: A Comparative Analysis of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh with Special Reference to Blasphemy Laws”. Kortex.

Explore the full record