Publication2017
A comparative evaluation of mixed dentition analysis on reliability of cone beam computed tomography image compared to plaster model
- Good Health and Well-being
- Empowered Indians
The record
- Type
- Publication
- Date
- 1 January 2017
- Level
- National
- Journal
- Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 214-217
- Published
- 1 January 2017
- DOI
- 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_182_17
- Scopus ID
- 85026919589
- ISSN
- 22310762
- Authors
- 6
- Open access
- No
- Citations
- 2
- International co-authorship
- No
- Co-author countries
- IN
Classification
Every label below carries the reasoning it was assigned on, the confidence band it was assigned in, and what produced it. The rubric is published.
UN Sustainable Development Goals
3 Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Comparative evaluation of cone beam CT reliability versus plaster models for dental mixed dentition analysis informing clinical diagnostic methodology.
- Moderate confidence
- The alignment is plausible and defensible but rests on an assumption a reasonable reviewer could decline. Published, and surfaced in the review queue for a human to confirm or override.
- Judged
- Judged against the published classification rubric, under the rubric and prompt versions recorded with the run that produced it.
- Produced by
- claude-haiku-4-5-20251001, under kortex-publication-v1
Viksit Bharat @2047
vb-1 Empowered Indians
Derived through the seeded SDG-to-Viksit-Bharat crosswalk from the primary SDG 3 label. Comparative evaluation of cone beam CT reliability versus plaster models for dental mixed dentition analysis informing clinical diagnostic methodology.
- Produced by
- claude-haiku-4-5-20251001, under kortex-publication-v1
Each label above carries the instrument and the version that produced it. How each classification is reached.
Evidence
Kortex hosts no documents. Evidence is an outbound link to the authority that holds it.
No outbound evidence link is recorded for this activity. The record below states which source it came from and when it was last read.
Provenance
Which source system this record came from, how many source rows were resolved into it, and when each was last read.
- Source rows resolved into this record
- 1
Each record carries the date Kortex last read it from its source system. That is a freshness date and not a verification: Kortex records what its sources say and when it read them, and it does not check those statements against any external authority. No claim on this site is described as verified, because none is.
Citing this record
This URL is stable. A record’s permalink is frozen when it is published and is not regenerated if its title is later corrected.
KIIT Deemed to be University. “A comparative evaluation of mixed dentition analysis on reliability of cone beam computed tomography image compared to plaster model”. Kortex.