Funded project2023
Mapping Global Best Practices in Pendency Reduction to Indian Judicial System and Tracing the Way Forward: An In depth Empirical Engagement with Select Courts of India
- Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
- Good Governance and Security
The record
- Type
- Funded project
- Date
- 25 July 2023
- Schools
- Reporting cycle
- 2024
- Nature
- Ongoing Research
- Sanctioned
- 25 July 2023
- Funding agency
- Ministry
- Sanction reference
- N-9/1/2023-NM (e-8335)
- Investigators
- 3
The reporting cycle is the year the activity was filed in the university’s returns, which is not always the year it took place.
Classification
Every label below carries the reasoning it was assigned on, the confidence band it was assigned in, and what produced it. The rubric is published.
UN Sustainable Development Goals
16.3 Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all
Ministry-funded empirical study mapping global best practice in judicial pendency reduction onto Indian courts; access to justice is the explicit subject.
- Certain confidence
- The record states the subject matter explicitly. A reader shown only the title and this goal would agree without hesitation. Example: a workshop titled "Renewable Energy and Smart Grid" against SDG 7.
- Judged
- Judged against the published classification rubric, under the rubric and prompt versions recorded with the run that produced it.
- Produced by
- claude-opus-5[1m], under kortex-input-v1+rubric@1.1.0#7bc5877481c9Input template kortex-input-v1; rubric 1.1.0. Each can change without the others, which is why the version is a composite.
Viksit Bharat @2047
vb-4 Good Governance and Security
Derived through the seeded SDG-to-Viksit-Bharat crosswalk from the primary SDG 16 label. Ministry-funded empirical study mapping global best practice in judicial pendency reduction onto Indian courts; access to justice is the explicit subject.
- Produced by
- claude-opus-5[1m], under kortex-input-v1+rubric@1.1.0#7bc5877481c9Input template kortex-input-v1; rubric 1.1.0. Each can change without the others, which is why the version is a composite.
Records of this type were classified by individual judgment against the published rubric, over 1,101 activities. Each label above carries the rubric version it was produced under. How each classification is reached.
Evidence
Kortex hosts no documents. Evidence is an outbound link to the authority that holds it.
No outbound evidence link is recorded for this activity. The record below states which source it came from and when it was last read.
Provenance
Which source system this record came from, how many source rows were resolved into it, and when each was last read.
- Source rows resolved into this record
- 3
- Source records held
- 3
3 rows across the university’s source registers were resolved into this one activity. Where those rows disagreed on a value, the disagreeing values are retained alongside the record and are never shown as a combined string.
| Source system | Reference | Last read |
|---|---|---|
| KIIT PBAS reporting workbook, 2024 cycle | Project & Consultancy - 2024!80 | |
| KIIT PBAS reporting workbook, 2024 cycle | Project & Consultancy - 2024!81 | |
| KIIT PBAS reporting workbook, 2024 cycle | Project & Consultancy - 2024!109 |
Each record carries the date Kortex last read it from its source system. That is a freshness date and not a verification: Kortex records what its sources say and when it read them, and it does not check those statements against any external authority. No claim on this site is described as verified, because none is.
Citing this record
This URL is stable. A record’s permalink is frozen when it is published and is not regenerated if its title is later corrected.
KIIT Deemed to be University. “Mapping Global Best Practices in Pendency Reduction to Indian Judicial System and Tracing the Way Forward: An In depth Empirical Engagement with Select Courts of India”. Kortex. Last read 17 September 2026.